Utilization of BIM for Construction Cost Estimation of the Girder Bridge Structure in the IKN Project (Karang Joang–KKT Kariangau Segment)

Authors

  • Irna Hendriyani Universitas Balikpapan
  • Reno Pratiwi Universitas Balikpapan
  • Risa Aghix Primastyo Utomo PT. Adhi Karya Tbk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20527/bpi.v8i2.300

Keywords:

Building Information Modeling (BIM), 5D BIM, Allplan Engineering, quantity takeoff (QTO), cost estimation, girder bridge, IKN Toll Road

Abstract

The implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) is increasingly important for improving the efficiency and accuracy of quantity takeoff and cost estimation in large-scale infrastructure projects. This study evaluates 5D BIM using Allplan Engineering for girder bridge structural work (pile cap, pier, and pierhead) in the IKN Toll Road project, Karang Joang–KKT Kariangau Segment and compares the results with Quantity Surveyor (QS) data and manual recalculation based on Detailed Engineering Design (DED) drawings. Using a comparative quantitative approach, the study developed a 3D model from DED data and performed BIM-based quantity extraction and cost estimation using unit prices from the project Budget Plan (RAB). The results show close agreement across methods, with total differences below 1% for both reinforcement and concrete quantities and costs. Compared with QS, BIM results are 0.17% lower for reinforcement and 0.17% higher for concrete; compared with manual recalculation, differences range from approximately 0.17% to 0.23%. Item-level discrepancies are most evident in Pierhead PH1 (up to 2.72% for concrete) and Pier P1 (up to 3.02% for reinforcement). Overall, 5D BIM in Allplan Engineering provides reliable and traceable outputs for quantity takeoff and cost estimation and supports faster updates during design revisions in national-scale infrastructure projects.

References

Chan, D. W. M., Olawumi, T. O., & Alfred, M. I. (2019). Perceived benefits of and barriers to building information modeling (BIM) implementation in construction: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Building Engineering, [volume](#[issue]), [pages]. [DOI/URL jika ada]

Diantoro, B. R., Hendriyani, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2024). Implementasi building information modeling (BIM) 5D pada pekerjaan struktur beton bertulang (studi kasus proyek pembangunan gedung kelas SMP Terpadu Balikpapan Regency). Jurnal Penelitian Teknik, 1(2), 128–141.

Farhana, A., & Abma, V. (2022). Implementasi konsep BIM 5D pada pekerjaan struktur proyek gedung. Jurnal RAB Construction Research, 7(2), 116–127.

Katke, S. S. (2020). Time and cost control of construction project using 5D BIM process. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7(8), 3247–3257.

Prastya, C. A., Hendriyani, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2025). Implementasi building information modelling (BIM) 5D pada estimasi volume dan biaya pekerjaan struktur. Bandar: Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(1), 17–24.

Salsabila, J., & Abma, V. (2023). Perbandingan realisasi biaya pelaksanaan terhadap RAB berbasis BIM 5D pada pekerjaan struktural bangunan. In Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum (pp. 102–110).

Setiawan, I., Hendriyani, I., & Pratiwi, R. (2025). Analisis building information modelling (BIM) 5D pada pekerjaan struktur beton bertulang bangunan kantor Kebun Muara Lawa. Journal of Applied Civil Engineering and Infrastructure Technology, 6(2), 129–136.

Suasira, I. W., Tapayasa, I. M., Santiana, I. M. A., & Wibawa, I. G. S. (2021). Analisis komparasi metode building information modeling (BIM) dan metode konvensional pada perhitungan RAB struktur proyek (studi kasus pembangunan Pasar Desa Adat Pecatu). Jurnal Teknik Gradien, 13(1), 12–19.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20